_ 105 _ and Muscat, with powers within His Majesty’s Treasury, and the judgment given on this in the Court of Appeal. I have a problem which you are to discuss at the Court of Appeal, for which purpose the Lord Count Viceroy should appoint judges. This is that the post to which the appointment is made is in effect that of Chief Treasury Officer or Superintendent of the Treasury, which is filled as His Majesty’s intends, which will be seen. Goa, 6 February 1598. Judgment Judgment in the Court of Appeal which arises from the Chancellor’s comment on the form of this commission in view of His Majesty’s intentions, but taking into account the cases and the need it indicates for a right so that on the part of the State [...]. With a statement Nicolau Pinto may collect for His Majesty’s Treasury all that is his by right, but that he may not incur further expenses nor have on account more than what is laid down in the statutes and regulations of our Lord, the King, and the Count Viceroy. Without orders from them no payment of old debts is to be made even if there are current documents concerning them. They are to make use of the writs which are now to be issued to them, both their own [...] and the rest in the manner set forth in them.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTg0NzAy